I write stuff. A lot of it is about cars and motorcycles.

2011 Triumph Sprint GT Review

2011 Triumph Sprint GT

2011 Triumph Sprint GT

The Triumph Sprint ST has been replaced by–or, rather, evolved into–the Sprint GT.  But looking at the specs in the Motorcycle.Com review, I’m not sure it’s an evolution to something better.  It may be, but the tale of the tape in comparison to the previous model doesn’t excite me.

First, the wheelbase has been lengthened significantly, from 57.3″ to 60.5″, which seems to threaten to reduce maneuverability (about which, more below).  But, I guess they had to lengthen the wheelbase, in order to stuff in the extra 60lbs of weight, with the GT model now coming in at a hefty 591lbs, fueled up and ready to ride.

In return for that 10% increase in weight the engine output has been slightly increased, from 123HP to 128HP, while torque jumps slightly to 79.7 ft-lbs–about 4 ft-pounds more than last year’s ST model.

The maneuverability reduction from the longer wheelbase seems to be offset by a narrower tires and more aggressive chassis geometry.  Power-to-weight ratio is much lower on the GT than the previous model, but it apparently still retains fine cornering and handling, despite the extra weight. And, of course, for the “touring” side of the sport-touring equation, the extra heft and longer wheelbase make for a steadier highway ride.

The looks have been updated a bit, although, to my eye, it looks very much like an FJR1300 with BMW saddlebags attached. In other words, the updated design is still about three or four years behind the times.

It also still has a chain drive, and whether you prefer that to a shaft is always a personal call.  Me, I want a shaft in a tourer.  It’s 2010.  Am I supposed to spend my Saturdays lubing a chain like some kind of animal?  Having said that, I’d trade my shaft-driven FJR for a chain-driven Ducati Multistrada without blinking an eye. (Actually, I’m begging for someone to let me make that deal.) But the Multistrada is not, first and foremost, a tourer.  It’s very much in the sport category, so the chain is appropriate.  At 600 pounds, however, the Sprint is definitely out of the sporting and into the touring category.

Still, for $13,199, you get a lot of bike for your money, so the drawbacks of the GT are not, at that price, by any means deal-breakers.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Pin on PinterestShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

3 Responses to 2011 Triumph Sprint GT Review

  • Pingback: 2011 Triumph Sprint GT Review | Motor Cycle Blog
  • I’m eagerly awaiting to see up close the new Sprint GT arrive at the dealers here on Oct 2nd.  My preferance is always for the chain drive.  I’ve driven both and the whole chain lube maintenance thing is a non-issue.   Once every second  gas refill, simply put it on it’s center stand, put it gear and let the rear wheel spin while you give it a shot of lube.  It takes all of 30 seconds and is one of the few remaining maintenance rituals a biker can do personally these days.  From the pictures, the sleek slim lines on the new Sprint look very appealing to me, but this is always a very subjective thing.  You absolutely cannot compare this bike with the new Multistrada, it is $7000 more and has that ungainly styling and bolt upright seating position that goes with being in the adventure bike segment.

  • as the past owner of a shaft drive BMW and more than one chain drive Trumpets I will take a chain drive (with center stand) any day of the week. It take s less time to lube a chain every 500 miles than change final drive fluid every 12,000.  And chains are MUCH cheaper to replace, DAMHIK.