2010 Indian Chief Vintage
Motorcycle.com got their hands on a 2010 Indian Chief Vintage for a ride review. The pictures are nice, and, apparently, the bike is even better-looking in person.
Its acre’s worth of chrome was so flawless, we wondered whether Indian had found alchemists who’d replaced mere chromium with magically-applied liquid mercury instead. “This might be the best quality chrome on a production bike I’ve seen to date,” quipped Pete on the Chief’s high-luster shiny stuff.
Likewise, the leatherwork looked and felt like it had been produced by a high-end boutique. The seat is actually supplied by Milsco, the same Milwaukee-based saddle-maker that had outfitted early-1940s and later Indians for some time before the original company ceased production in 1953.
Alas, despite the beauty, there are also some blemishes.
Unfortunately, we can not compliment some of the other buzzes this bike’s engine induced. It visibly shook the tank, and audible resonation came possibly from the windshield – or maybe it was just the tank? In top gear at cruising speed with earplugs in, it was still audible. Specifically, the buzz began at around 2,600 rpm, and discouraged us from wanting to rev it anywhere near its 5,250 rpm redline.
After riding the Vintage on the highway, Pete said he felt like his feet might vibrate off the floorboards.
The 105ci V-Twin powerplant is rigidly mounted, and has no counter-balancers, which might account for the vibration problem. Of course, it is a “vintage” model, so vintage design isn’t completely out of place. and, besides, vibration is really in the butt of the beholder, right?
Well, maybe. But when you’re riding a bike that costs as much as an Acura, you might want a little refinement in comfort to go along with all that liquid-mercury chrome.
Any messages transmitted to the administrator(s) or the author(s) of Dale's Motorcycle Blog, whether transmitted electronically or by any other means, may be reprinted at our discretion, and used for purposes of commentary, debate, satire, or humor. Transmission of such messages constitutes implied consent to publicly reprint such messages.